SWOT CROSS-IMPACT
ANALYSIS - STUDENT LEARNING TEAM
From SWOT Analysis : S = Strengths,
W= Weaknesses, O= Opportunities, T = Threats
| S1 = Some committed innovative staff using Student Centred Learning | O1 = Developing team ethos through holistic approach to teaching / learning | W1 = Learning confined by parochialism and content based teaching | T1 = Funding limits |
| S2 = Curriculum : Diverse and Measurable | O2 = Assessment of outcomes for all learners | W2 = Lack of relevance and lock-step progression for learners | T2 = Overcrowded Curriculum |
| S1 | S2 | O1 | O2 | W1 | W2 | T1 | T2 | IMPACT |
||||
EVENTS
|
Total |
Total |
Absolute | Sum
/ |
||||||||
| Opportunities for career -long training for teachers | +8 |
+9 |
+7 |
+7 |
-6 |
-2 |
-5 |
-1 |
+31 |
-14 |
45 |
+17 |
| Focused technology funding on student learning. | +8 |
+6 |
0 |
+2 |
-5 |
-6 |
+2 |
-4 |
+18 |
-13 |
31 |
+5 |
| Create new courses to link with new skills. | +6 |
+10 |
+2 |
+7 |
-9 |
-8 |
+1 |
-6 |
+26 |
-22 |
48 |
+4 |
| Flexible organisation to cater for all learners. | +9 |
+10 |
+7 |
+5 |
-7 |
-9 |
+5 |
-7 |
+36 |
-23 |
59 |
+13 |
| Training in new understandings of how a learner learns, thinks, knows and can do. |
+10 |
+5 |
+8 |
+9 |
-6 |
-8 |
0 |
-2 |
+32 |
-16 |
48 |
+16 |
| ( Column Sum gives a measure of Sensitivity ) | +41 |
+40 |
+24 |
+30 |
-33 |
-33 |
+3 |
-20 |
||||
1. Row totals give the impact. Different interpretations are possible for the Sum and Total Absolute.
2. An impact study is normally done for each of Strengths / Weaknesses / Opportunities / Threats identified. Here two of each of SWOT were selected.
3. Scale: +10 Strong Driving Force, +5 Some Support/Impact, 0
No Support/Impact, -5 Some Opposition/Hindrance, -10 Strongly Inhibits.
Cross impact of the SWOT item on the Event / Strategic Option. (After, Rick
Slaughter, Presentation and Group work on 19/8/98)